Andrew Lobaczewski - Political Ponerology: A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes

chev thaw, which had seen Alexander Solzhenitsyn allowed to publish A Day

on the Life of Ivan Denisovich - he submitted the manuscript to a literary

journal in 1960 for publication. But Solzhenitsyn was one thing, Grossman

another: his manuscript was confiscated, as were the sheets of carbon paper

and typewriter ribbons he had used to write it. Suslov, the Politbureau mem-

ber in charge of ideology, is reported as having said it could not be published

for 200 years. However, it was smuggled out on microfilm to the west by

Vladimir Voinovich, and published, first in France in 1980, then in English in

1985.

Why the 200 year ban? Because Life and Fate commits what was still, in a

‘liberal’ environment, the unthinkable sin of arguing for the moral equiva-

lence of Nazism and Soviet communism. [Editor’s note.]

POLITICAL PONEROLOGY

113

might be even minimally right, nor that

Pathological egotism.

he might be even minimally wrong. He

would often call his opponents huck-

Paramoralisms.

sters, lackeys, servant-boys, mercenar-

ies, agents, or Judases bribed for thirty

pieces of silver. He made no attempt to

persuade his opponents during a dis-

pute. He communicated not with them,

Spellbinding and of con-

but rather with those witnessing the

sciousness and its effects.

dispute, in order to ridicule and com-

promise his adversaries. Sometimes

such witnesses were just a few people,

sometimes thousands of delegates to a

Lack of the self- criticism.

congress, sometimes millions worth

throngs of newspaper readers.

~~~

Frontal characteropathy : The frontal areas of the cerebral

cortex (10A and B acc. to the Brodmann division) are virtually

present in no creature except man; they are composed of the

phylogenetically youngest nervous tissue. Their cyto-

architecture is similar to the much older visual projection areas

on the opposite pole of the brain. This suggests some functional

similarity. The author has found a relatively easy way to test

this psychological function, which enables us to grasp a certain

number of imaginary elements in our field of consciousness

and subject them to internal contemplation. The capacity of this

act of internal projection varies greatly from one person to

another, manifesting a statistical correlation with similar varie-

gation in the anatomical extent of such areas. The correlation

between this capacity and general intelligence is much lower.

As described by researchers (Luria et al.), the functions of

these areas, thought-process acceleration and coordination,

seem to result from this basic function.

Damage to this area occurred rather frequently: at or near

birth, especially for premature infants, and later in life as a

result of various causes. The number of such perinatal brain

tissue lesions has been significantly reduced due to improved

medical care for pregnant women and newborns. The spectacu-

lar ponerogenic role which results from character disorders

114

PONEROLOGY

caused by this can thus be considered somewhat characteristic

of past generations and primitive cultures.

Brain cortex damage in these areas selectively impairs the

above mentioned function without impairing memory, associa-

tive capacity, or, in particular, such instinct-based feelings and

functions as, for instance, the ability to intuit a psychological

situation. The general intelligence of an individual is thus not

greatly reduced. Children with such a defect are almost normal

students; difficulties emerge suddenly in upper grades and af-

fect principally these parts of the curriculum which place bur-

den on the above function.

The pathological character of such people, generally con-

taining a component of hysteria, develops through the years.

The non-damaged psychological functions become overdevel-

oped to compensate, which means that instinctive and affective

reactions predominate. Relatively vital people become belliger-

ent, risk-happy, and brutal in both word and deed.

Persons with an innate talent for intuiting psychological

situations tend to take advantage of this gift in an egotistical

and ruthless fashion. In the thought process of such people, a

short cut way develops which bypasses the handicapped func-

tion, thus leading from associations directly to words, deeds,

and decisions which are not subject to any dissuasion. Such

individuals interpret their talent for intuiting situations and

making split-second oversimplified decisions as a sign of their

superiority compared to normal people, who need to think for

long time, experiencing self-doubt and conflicting motivations.

The fate of such creatures does not deserve to be pondered

long.

Such “Stalinistic characters” traumatize and actively spell-

bind others, and their influence finds it exceptionally easy to

bypass the controls of common sense. A large proportion of

people tend to credit such individuals with special powers,

thereby succumbing to their egotistic beliefs. If a parent mani-

fests such a defect, no matter how minimal, all the children in

the family evidence anomalies in personality development.

The author studied an entire generation of older, educated,

people wherein the source of such influence was the eldest

sister who suffered perinatal damage of the frontal centers.

POLITICAL PONEROLOGY

115

From early childhood, her four younger brothers exposed to

and assimilated pathologically altered psychological material,

including their sister’s growing component of hysteria. They

retained well into their sixties the deformities of personality

and world view, as well as the hysterical features thus caused,

whose intensity diminished in proportion to the greater differ-

ence in age.

Subconscious selection of information made it impossible

for these men to apprehend any critical comments regarding

their sister’s character; also, any such comments were consid-

ered to be an offense to the family honor.

The brothers accepted as real their sister’s pathological de-

lusions and complaints about her “bad” husband (who was

actually a decent person) and her son, in whom she found a

scapegoat to avenge her failures. They thereby participated in a

world of vengeful emotions, considering their sister a com-

pletely normal person whom they were prepared to defend by

the most unsavory methods, if need be, against any suggestion

of her abnormality. They thought normal woman were insipid

and naive, good for nothing but sexual conquest. Not one

among the brothers ever created a healthy family or developed

even average wisdom of life.

The character development of these people also included

many other factors that were dependent upon the time and

place in which they were reared: the turn of the century, with a

patriotic Polish father and German mother who obeyed con-

temporary custom by formally accepting her husband’s nation-

ality, but who still remained an advocate of the militarism, and

customary acceptance of the intensified hysteria which covered

Europe at the time. That was the Europe of the three Emperors:

the splendor of three people with limited intelligence, two of

whom revealed pathological traits. The concept of “honor”

sanctified triumph. Staring at someone too long was sufficient

pretext for a duel. These brothers were thus raised to be valiant

duelists covered with saber-scars; however, the slashes they

inflicted upon their opponents were more frequent and much

worse.

When people with a humanistic education pondered the per-

sonalities of this family, they concluded that the causes for this

116

PONEROLOGY

formation should be sought in contemporary time and customs.

If, however, the sister had not suffered brain damage and the

pathological factor had not existed (exclusionary hypothesis),

their personalities would have developed more normally even

during those times. They would have become more critical and

more amenable to the values of healthy reasoning and humanis-

tic contents. They would have founded better families and re-

ceived more sensible advice from wives more wisely chosen.

As for the evil they sowed too liberally during their lives, it

would either not have existed at all, or else would have been

reduced to a scope conditioned by more remote pathological

factors.

Comparative considerations also led the author to conclude

that Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili, also known as Stalin,

should be included in the list of this particular ponerogenic

characteropathy, which developed against the backdrop of

perinatal damage to his brain’s prefrontal fields. Literature and

news about him abounds in indications: brutal, charismatic,

snake-charming; issuing of irrevocable decisions; inhuman

ruthlessness, pathologic revengefulness directed at anyone who

got in his way; and egotistical belief in his own genius on the

part of a person whose mind was, in fact, only average. This

state explains as well his psychological dependence on a psy-

chopath like Beria39. Some photographs reveal the typical de-

formation of his forehead which appears in people who suf-

fered very early damage to the areas mentioned above. His

typical irrevocable decisions his daughter describes as follows:

~~~

Whenever he threw out of his heart someone whom he

had known for a long time, classifying him among his

39 L.P. Beria (1899–1953), Soviet Communist leader, b. Georgia. He rose to

prominence in the Cheka (secret police) in Georgia and the Transcaucasus,

became party secretary in these areas, and in 1938 became head of the secret

police. As commissar (later minister) of internal affairs, Beria wielded great

power, and he was the first in this post to become (1946) a member of the

politburo. After Stalin’s death (Mar., 1953), Beria was made first deputy

premier under Premier Malenkov, but the alliance was shaky; in the ensuing

struggle for power Beria was arrested (July) on charges of conspiracy. He and

six alleged accomplices were tried secretly and shot in Dec., 1953. [Editor’s

note.]

POLITICAL PONEROLOGY

117

“enemies” in his soul, it was impossible to talk to him about

that person. The reverse process became impossible for

him, namely persuasion that he was not his enemy, and any

attempts in that direction made him fly into a rage. Redens,

Uncle Pavlusha, and A.S. Svanidze were incapable of doing

anything about it; all they accomplished was to have my fa-

ther break off contacts and withdraw his trust. After seeing

any of them for the last time, he said goodbye as if to a po-

tential foe, one of his “enemies”…40

~~~

We know the effect of being “thrown out of his heart”, as it