Andrew Lobaczewski - Political Ponerology: A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes

193

role in ponerizing the movement and preparing for revolution,

are also eliminated. Adherents of the revolutionary ideology

are unscrupulously “pushed into a counter-revolutionary posi-

tion”. They are now condemned for “moral” reasons in the

name of new criteria whose paramoralistic essence they are not

in a position to comprehend. Violent negative selection of the

original group now ensues. The inspirational role of essential

psychopathy is now also consolidated; it remains characteristic

for the entire future of this macrosocial pathological phenome-

non.

In spite of these transformations, the pathological block of

the revolutionary movement remains a minority, a fact which

cannot be changed by propaganda pronouncements about the

moral majority adhering to the new, more glorious version of

the ideology. The rejected majority and the very forces which

naively created such power to begin with, start mobilizing

against the block of psychopaths who have taken over. Ruth-

less confrontation with these forces is seen by the psychopathic

block as the only way to safeguard the long-term survival of

the pathological authority. We must thus consider the bloody

triumph of a pathological minority over the movement’s major-

ity to be a transitional phase during which the new contents of

the phenomenon coagulate.

The entire life of a society thus affected then becomes sub-

ordinated to deviant thought-criteria and permeated by their

specific experiential mode, especially the one described in the

section on essential psychopathy. At this point, using the name

of the original ideology to designate this phenomenon is mean-

ingless and becomes an error rendering its comprehension

more difficult.

I shall accept the denomination of pathocracyfor a system

of government thus created, wherein a small pathological mi-

nority takes control over a society of normal people. The name

thus selected, above all, emphasizes the basic quality of the

macrosocial psychopathological phenomenon, and differenti-

ates it from the many possible social systems dominated by

normal people’s structure, custom, and law.

I tried to find a name which would more clearly designate

the psychopathological, even psychopathic quality of such a

194

PATHOCRACY

government, but I gave up because of certain perceived phe-

nomena (to be referred to below) and for practical considera-

tions (to avoid lengthening the denomination). Such a name

sufficiently indicates the phenomenon’s basic quality and also

emphasizes that the ideological cloak (or some other ideology

which cloaked similar phenomena in the past) does not consti-

tute its essence . When I happened to hear that a Hungarian

scientist unknown to me had already used this term, my deci-

sion was finalized. I think this name is consistent with the de-

mands of semantics, since no concise term can adequately

characterize such a complex phenomenon. I shall also hence-

forth designate the social systems wherein the links of normal

people dominate in any way as “the systems of normal man”.

More on the Contents of the Phenomenon

The achievement of absolute domination by pathocrats in

the government of a country cannot be permanent since large

sectors of the society become disaffected by such rule and

eventually find some way of toppling it. This is part of the

historical cycle, easily discerned when history is read from a

ponerological point of view. Pathocracy at the summit of gov-

ernmental organization also does not constitute the entire pic-

ture of the “mature phenomenon”. Such a system of govern-

ment has nowhere to go but down.

In a pathocracy, all leadership positions, (down to village

headman and community cooperative managers, not to mention

the directors of police units, and special services police person-

nel, and activists in the pathocratic party) must be filled by

individuals with corresponding psychological deviations,

which are inherited as a rule. However, such people constitute

a very small percentage of the population and this makes them

more valuable to the pathocrats. Their intellectual level or pro-

fessional skills cannot be taken into account, since people rep-

resenting superior abilities are even harder to find. After such a

system has lasted several years, one hundred percent of all the

cases of essential psychopathy are involved in pathocratic ac-

tivity; they are considered the most loyal, even though some of

them were formerly involved on the other side in some way.

POLITICAL PONEROLOGY

195

Under such conditions, no area of social life can develop

normally, whether in economics, culture, science, technology,

administration, etc. Pathocracy progressively paralyzes every-

thing. Normal people must develop a level of patience beyond

the ken of anyone living in a normal man’s system just in order

to explain what to do and how to do it to some obtuse medioc-

rity of a psychological deviant who has been placed in charge

of some project that he cannot even understand, much less

manage. This special kind of pedagogy – instructing deviants

while avoiding their wrath - requires a great deal of time and

effort, but it would otherwise not be possible to maintain toler-

able living conditions and necessary achievements in the eco-

nomic area or intellectual life of a society. Even with such ef-

forts, pathocracy progressively intrudes everywhere and dulls

everything.

Those people who initially found the original ideology at-

tractive eventually come to the realization that they are in fact

dealing with something else that has taken its place under the

old name. The disillusionment experienced by such former

ideological adherents is bitter in the extreme. Thus, the patho-

logical minority’s attempts to retain power will be threatened

by the society of normal people, whose criticism keeps grow-

ing.

Therefore, to mitigate the threat to their power, the

pathocrats must employ any and all methods of terror and ex-

terminatory policies against individuals known for their patri-

otic feelings and military training; other, specific “indoctrina-

tion” activities such as those we have presented are also util-

ized. Individuals lacking the natural feeling of being linked to

normal society become irreplaceable in either of these activi-

ties. Again, the foreground of this type of activity is occupied

by cases of essential psychopathy, followed by those with simi-

lar anomalies, and finally by people alienated from the society

in question as a result of racial or national differences.

The phenomenon of pathocracy matures during this period:

an extensive and active indoctrination system is built, with a

suitably refurbished ideology constituting the vehicle or Trojan

horse for the purpose of pathologizing the thought processes of

individuals and society. The goal- forcing human minds to

196

PATHOCRACY

incorporate pathological experiential methods and thought-

patterns, and consequently accepting such rule - is never

openly admitted. This goal is conditioned by pathological ego-

tism, and the possibility of accomplishing it strikes the

pathocrats as not only indispensable, but feasible. Thousands of

activists must therefore participate in this work. However, time

and experience confirm what a psychologist may have long

foreseen: the entire effort produces results so very limited that

it is reminiscent of the labors of Sisyphus. It only results in

producing a general stifling of intellectual development and

deep-rooted protest against affront-mongering “hypocrisy”.

The authors and executors of this program are incapable of

understanding that the decisive factor making their work diffi-

cult is the fundamental nature of normal human beings – the

majority.

The entire system of force, terror, and forced indoctrination,

or, rather, pathologization, thus proves effectively unfeasible,

which causes the pathocrats no small measure of surprise. Re-

ality places a question mark on their conviction that such

methods can change people in such fundamental ways so that

they can eventually recognize this pathocratic kind of govern-

ment as a “normal state”.

During the initial shock, the feeling of social links between

normal people fade. After that has been survived, however, the

overwhelming majority of people begin to manifest their own

phenomenon of psychological immunization. Society simulta-

neously starts collecting practical knowledge on the subject of

this new reality and its psychological properties.

Normal people slowly learn to perceive the weak spots of

such a system and utilize the possibilities of more expedient

arrangement of their lives. They begin to give each other ad-

vice in these matters, thus slowly regenerating the feelings of

social links and reciprocal trust. A new phenomenon occurs:

separation between the pathocrats and the society of normal

people . The latter have an advantage of talent, professional

skills, and healthy common sense. They therefore hold certain

very advantageous cards. The pathocracy finally realizes that it

must find some modus vivendi or relations with the majority of

society: “After all, somebody’s got to do the work for us.”

POLITICAL PONEROLOGY

197

There are other needs and pressures felt by the pathocrats,

especially from outside. The pathological face must be hidden

from the world somehow, since recognition of the deviant rul-

ership by world opinion would be a catastrophe. Ideological

propaganda alone would then be an inadequate disguise. Pri-

marily in the interests of the new elite and its expansionary

plans, a pathocratic state must maintain commercial relations

with the countries of normal man. The pathocratic state aims to

achieve international recognition as a certain kind of political

structure; and it fears recognition in terms of a true clinical

diagnosis.

All this makes pathocrats tend to limit their measures of ter-

ror, subjecting their propaganda and indoctrination methods to

a certain cosmetology, and to accord the society they control

some margin of autonomous activity, especially regarding cul-

tural life. The more liberal pathocrats would not be averse to

giving such a society a certain minimum of economic prosper-

ity in order to reduce the irritation level, but their own corrup-

tion and inability to administer the economy prevents them

from doing so.

And so, with the above considerations being brought to the

forefront of pathocratic attention, this great societal disease

continues to run its course through a new phase: methods of

activity become milder, and there is coexistence with countries

whose structure is that of normal man.

Any psychopathologist studying this phenomenon will be