Лев Гунин - ГУЛаг Палестины
- Название:ГУЛаг Палестины
- Автор:
- Жанр:
- Издательство:неизвестно
- Год:неизвестен
- ISBN:нет данных
- Рейтинг:
- Избранное:Добавить в избранное
-
Отзывы:
-
Ваша оценка:
Лев Гунин - ГУЛаг Палестины краткое содержание
ГУЛаг Палестины - читать онлайн бесплатно полную версию (весь текст целиком)
Интервал:
Закладка:
recover the costs of social assistance in cases of sponsorship default.
People receiving social assistance, except for reasons of disability, will not
be able to sponsor.
Why we are doing it:
To strengthen the integrity of the sponsorship program.
Streamlining Appeals
What we are doing:
Introducing a new leave requirement for people appealing visa officer
decisions from overseas.
Developing an alternative dispute resolution mechanism for overseas
decisions.
Limiting inland humanitarian and compassionate applications to one per
year.
Why we are doing it:
To provide a screening mechanism for applications to the Federal Court for
review of overseas decisions. The leave provision currently exists for inland
applications only.
To provide an effective, alternative means of reviewing and solving disputes
regarding overseas decisions.
To ensure a fast and fair inland system for considering applications on
humanitarian and compassionate grounds.
Business Immigration
What we are doing:
Establishing objective criteria to assess business experience for both the
investor and entrepreneur programs.
Creating a new net worth requirement for entrepreneurs.
Why we are doing it:
To strengthen the integrity of the business immigration program.
Objective Criteria for Permanent Residence
What we are doing:
Introducing a clear physical residency requirement. To retain permanent
residence status, a person must be physically present in Canada for a
cumulative period of 2 years for every 5 working years. People who spend
time overseas for specific reasons (to accompany a Canadian citizen, to
work for a Canadian company, or for humanitarian reasons) will retain their
status.
Developing a fraud-resistant permanent resident card.
Ensuring an oral appeal to the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) for all
loss of status cases.
Ensuring that permanent residents without a valid card have the right to
enter if they have been outside Canada for less than one year.
Why we are doing it:
To implement a clear objective standard that is easier to administer.
To replace a document that is easy to forge with one that has
state-of-the-art security features.
And Refugees
Strengthening Refugee Protection: Overseas Resettlement
What we are doing:
Amending the criteria for "ability to establish in Canada" to include social as
well as economic factors.
Pursuing agreements with NGOs to locate, identify, refer and pre-screen
refugee applications in areas where refugees are most in need of protection.
Ensuring that people in urgent need of protection are brought to Canada
within days.
Why we are doing it:
To ensure that the need for protection is the overriding objective in
resettlement from abroad.
To focus existing resources on areas where refugees are most in need of
protection.
Facilitating Family Reunification of Refugees
What we are doing:
Processing overseas families as a unit, including extended family members
of refugees whenever possible.
Allowing dependants of refugees, selected inland or abroad, to be
processed as part of the same application for a period of one year after a
refugee has acquired permanent resident status.
Exempting refugees, their spouses, partners and dependants from the
admission bar with regard to excessive demand on health or social services.
Why we are doing it:
To facilitate the reunification of refugees with their family members as soon
as reasonably practicable.
Faster and Fair Refugee Processing Inland
What we are doing:
Referral to the IRB to be made within three working days.
Consolidating protection decisions at the IRB to examine all risk grounds at
a single hearing. Grounds will include the Geneva Convention, the
Convention against Torture, and the risk of cruel or unusual treatment or
punishment.
The use of single-member panels as the norm, supported by the
establishment of a paper appeal on merit.
Reducing the waiting period from 5 to 3 years for the landing in Canada of
undocumented refugees who are unable to obtain documents from their
listed country of origin because there is no central authority in that country
to issue documents.
Why we are doing it:
To allow genuine refugees to be processed faster so that their lives are not
put in limbo while they wait for decisions crucial to their future.
To provide a fair opportunity to correct errors in law or fact in the first
instance, and to increase the integrity of the decision-making process.
Front-end Security Screening
What it is:
A security check initiated when a person makes a refugee claim.
Why we are doing it:
To catch criminals and people who present security risks at the start of the
process and speed genuine refugees through the system. Currently, a
security screening is carried out only once a person is granted refugee
status by the IRB.
Admissibility Hearing
What it is:
A hearing before an independent adjudicator to decide whether a person is
admissible to Canada.
Why we are doing it:
To make fair but fast decisions on security cases.
Pre-removal Risk Assessment
What we are doing:
Legislating a procedure to fairly assess the risk of return prior to removal.
There will be flexibility for an oral hearing should the complexity of the case
require it.
Repeat claimants, failed refugee claimants, and refugees who have
withdrawn or abandoned their claims will be assessed on the grounds of the
Geneva Convention, the United Nations Convention against Torture, and the
risk of cruel or unusual treatment or punishment.
People found to be inadmissible to Canada for reasons of serious
criminality, security, organized crime or violations of human rights will be
assessed on the grounds of the United Nations Convention against Torture
and the risk of cruel or unusual treatment or punishment.
Why we are doing it:
To ensure that there is a fair and effective procedure for assessing the risk
of return for individuals being removed from Canada.
Strengthening Enforcement
Penalties
What we are doing:
Increasing penalties for existing offences.
Creating a new offence for human trafficking.
Extending Criminal Code counterfeiting provisions (which currently apply
only to passports) to cover any immigration document or travel document
(with an exemption for refugees).
Allowing for the seizure of assets in cases of migrant smuggling and
trafficking.
Providing new authority to seize citizenship documents to prevent fraud.
Creating a new offence for people who counsel a person to misrepresent
himself or herself or to commit an offence under the Act.
Creating a new offence for the possession and laundering of proceeds from
immigration offences.
Raising the penalty to life in prison for migrant smuggling and trafficking.
Why we are doing it:
To ensure that we have the tools we need to combat organized crime and
human trafficking.
Exclusion from the Refugee Determination System
What we are doing:
Barring access to serious criminals, people who present security risks,
organizers of criminal operations, or violators of human rights. A "serious
criminal" is defined as someone who was convicted of an offence punishable
by 10 years or more and who has received a sentence of 2 years or more in
Canada. People convicted of an offence punishable by 10 years or more
outside Canada will only be excluded if the Minister finds them to be a
danger to the public.
Why we are doing it:
To prevent abuse of the refugee protection system.
Eliminating Appeals
What we are doing:
Eliminating appeals to the Immigration Appeal Division for serious criminals,
people who present security risks, members of criminal organizations and
war criminals. There will remain recourse to judicial review with leave by the
Federal Court.
Why we are doing it:
To ensure that we can remove serious criminals and people who pose a
security threat to Canada without delay.
Suspension of a Refugee Claim
What it is:
The ability to suspend a person's application for protection before the IRB if
he or she has been charged with a crime. The claim would be suspended
until the courts have rendered a decision on the case.
Why we are doing it:
To prevent abuse of the system by people who come to Canada not
because they need protection but because they intend to engage in crime.
Repeat Claims
What we are doing:
Extending the period after which a new claim can be made from 90 days to
six months.
Why we are doing it:
To avoid "revolving door" situations where failed refugee claimants return to
Canada and make multiple claims.
Detention and Day Parole
What we are doing:
Excluding incarcerated foreign criminals under removal order from day
parole.
Why we are doing it:
It is inconsistent to integrate individuals into Canadian society who are to be
deported on completion of their sentence.
Streamlined Security Certificate Process
What we are doing:
Applying to permanent residents the security certificate process that
currently applies only to non-permanent residents. The process requires the
signatures of two ministers to the effect that the person is inadmissible on
grounds of security, and a review of the certificate by a Federal Court judge.
Why we are doing it:
To make it easier to remove permanent residents who pose a serious threat
to national security.
New Inadmissibility Classes
What they are:
Two new classes of people who will be inadmissible to Canada: (1) people
subject to travel sanctions imposed by Canada as a member of an
international organization such as the United Nations; (2) people who
committed fraud or misrepresentation on an immigration application will be
inadmissible for 2 years.
Why we are doing it:
To strengthen our ability to enforce international sanctions.
To prevent immigration to Canada through fraudulent means.
Backgrounder # 3
Milestones On the Road to New Legislation
Since 1996, the Government of Canada has been reviewing immigration and
refugee policy and legislation with a view to fundamental policy reform and the
introduction of new legislation.
The comprehensive review process that has been under way since has involved a
significant number of consultations with many different groups and interests as well
as with individual Canadians. Ministers have been discussing immigration reform
with Canadians for more than four years.
This process has included:
The appointment of a Legislative Review Advisory Group (LRAG) in 1996
commenced a major consultation process both by LRAG and by the
government on their report, Not Just Numbers, in 1998.
A Red Book commitment in 1997 and 2000 to streamline and update the
immigration/refugee system, which promised to implement changes to
make Canada's immigration system simpler, more effective, and more
easily understood.
The release of the White Paper, Building on a Strong Foundation for the
Читать дальшеИнтервал:
Закладка: