Татьяна Мосолкина - Социальная история Англии XIV-XVII вв.

Pryce G.A. Popular History of Bristol. Bristol, 1861.

Raine J. York. L., 1893.

Ramsay G.D. English Overseas Trade During the Centuries of Emergence. L., 1957. Ramsay J. Lancaster and York. L., 1892.

Reynolds S. An Introduction to the History of English Medieval Towns. Oxford, 1977. Riley R.W.J. A Social and Economic History of England. L., 1965.

Riley Th. Memorials of London and London Life in the XIII, XIV and XV Centuries. L., 1868.

Rogers J.E.Th. The Industrial and Commercial History of England. L., 1891.

Ross C.D. Bristol in the Middle Ages // Bristol and Its Adjoining Counties. Brisrol, 1955. Ross Ch. Richard III. L., 1981.

Rosser G. The Art of Solidarity in the Middle Ages: Guilds in England 1250–1550. Oxford, 2015.

Ruigh R. The Parliament of 1624: Politics and Foreign Policy. Cambridge, Mass. 1971.

Rymer Th. Foedera, conventiones, littearae at cuiuscunque generis acta publica. L., 1704–1735.

Sacks D.H. Trade, Society and Politics in Bristol, 1500–1640. N. Y., 1985. Vol. I–II.

Sacks D.H. The Corporate Town and the English State: Bristol’s “Little Business” 1625 — 1641 // Past and Present. 1986. № 110.

Sadler J. Border Fury: England and Scotland at War, 1296–1568. Longman, 2004.

Salzman L.F. English Trade in the Middle Ages. Oxford, 1931.

Salzman L.F. Building in England down to 1540. Oxford, 1952.

Salzman L.F. English Industries of the Middle Ages. Oxford, 1964.

Saunders B. The Age of Candlelight. The English Social Scene in the 17 thCentury. L., 1959.

Seaward P. The Cavalier Parlament and the Reconstruction of the Old Regime, 1661 — 1667. Cambridge, 1989.

Sherborne J. The Port of Bristol in the Middle Ages. Bristol, 1965.

Shillington V.M., Chapman A.B. W. The Commercial Relations of England and Portugal. N.Y., 1970.

Slater M. Family Life in the Seventeenth Century: The Verneys of Claydon House. L., 1984.

Social History of England 1200–1500. / Ed. by R. Horrox, W.M. Ormrod. Cambridge, 2006.

Sommerville J.P. Papalist Political Thought and the Controversy over the Oath of Allegiance // Catholics and the “Protestant Nation” / Ed. by E. Shagan. Manchester, 2005.

Sprat T. The History of the Royal Society. St. Louis, 1957.

Stone L. The Causes of the English Revolution, 1529–1642. L., 1972.

Stone L. The Family, Sex and Marriage in England, 1500–1800. L., 1977.

Studies in English Trade in the Fifteenth Century / Ed. by E. Power and M. Postan. N.Y., 1933.

Swanson H. Medieval Artisans. An Urban Class in Late Medieval England. Oxford, 1989.

Swanson H. Medieval British Towns. N.Y., 1999.

TaitJ. The Medieval English Borough. Studies on Its Origins and Constitutional History. Manchester, 1936.

Tanner R. The Late Medieval Scottish Parliament. Politics and the Three Estates, 1424– 1488. East Linton, 2001.

The English Medieval Town. A Reader in English Urban History 1200–1540 / Ed. by R. Holt and G. Rosser. L.;N.Y., 1990.

The Origins of Museums.The Cabinet of Curiosities in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Europe.Oxford, 1985.

The Oxford Companion to Local and Family History / Ed. by D. Hey. Oxford, 2002.

Thomas J.H. Town Government in the Sixteenth Century. L., 1933.

Thrupp S. The Merchant Class of Medieval London, 1300–1500. Chicago, 1948.

Tout T.F. The Place of the Reign of Edward II in English History. Manchester, 1914.

Towns and Townspeople in the Fifteenth Century / Ed. by J.A.F. Thomson. Gloucester, 1988.

Trevelyan G.M. English Social History. A Survey of Six Centuries Chaucer to Queen Victoria. L., 1946.

Unwin G. The Gilds and Companies of London. L., 1908.

Veal E.M. The English Fur Trade in the Later Middle Ages. Oxford, 1966.

Vergil P. Three Books of English History Comprising the Reigns of Henry VI, Edward IV and Richard III. L., 1844.

Victoria History of the Counties of England. Gloucestershire. L., 1907.

Wavrin J. Recuell des Croniques / Ed. by W. Hardy. L.,1868.

Weinmaum M. The Incorporation of Boroughs. Manchester, 1937.

Willcox W.B. Gloucestershire: A Study in Local Government, 1590–1640. New Haven, 1940.

Winston J.E. English Towns in the Wars of Roses. Princeton, 1921.

Wrigley E., Schofield R. The Population History of England 1541 — 1871: A Reconstruction. L., 1981.

Wysocki D.K. Readings in Social Research Methods. Wadsworth, 2004.

The book is devoted to topical problems of the 14 th–17 thcentury social history of England. Modern understanding of social history includes the whole spectrum of society life, from economic relations to various forms of daily routine. An inseparable part of Western-European society history is the history of the medieval town. It is impossible to understand the evolution of this society without studying it. The more important are transitional stages when established old relations come into collision and interweave with the new ones. In different countries and towns changes in different spheres of social life did not take place simultaneously. In every case they had their own features. New phenomena could appear and, then, vanish for some definite time. But these fluctuations and peculiarities do not deny common laws of development. Over the last decades researchers are getting more interested in the problem of transitional epochs that existed in various periods of history and in various countries.

Using numerous sources the author considers different aspects of life in England: correlation of industry and trade in economic development of the country, guild and off-guild craft, decay of medieval guilds and emergence of new forms of production, influence of wide international ties and entrepreneurial activity on people’s psychology, traditions of self-government in English towns, daily routine and, especially, mentality of townspeople in the 14 th— 17 thcenturies, and so on.

The data given in the book show that the 14 th— 17 thcenturies was the time for England that brought a lot of changes into economy, social relations, and peoples psychology. The analyzed material makes it possible to conclude that in the 14 th— 17 thcenturies not only in the capital but in provincial towns as well there started to emerge new forms of manufacturing organization — the system of buying up and distribution, simple capitalist cooperation, and, in some cases, manufactory.

Craft guilds keeping their outward form began to change from the inside. First of all it could be well seen in export branches of production — cloth making, metal working, and tanning. For example, the majority of Bristol dyers worked for a small number of guild members who were engaged only in cloth exporting.

Emergence of new forms of production in the 14 th— 15 thcenturies was not connected with the decay of the guild system. For a long time they co-existed in many branches of industry.

It is necessary to note that new developments were characteristic both for towns and villages. Early capitalist production in the village was set up due to accumulation of capital by town manufacturers who organized and controlled not only town production but also country craftsmen.

Bristol’s history evidences that early capitalism in Italian towns of the 14 thcentury was not a unique phenomenon. That age was the time when similar processes in economy took place in different European countries. New capitalist forms of production occurred in the textile industry of England, the Netherlands, and Germany. In the 15 thcentury other branches, such as mining, book printing, soap and sugar manufacture, joined this process. Though in England early capitalist relations were developing more slowly than, for example, in Italy, they proved to be more viable due to early economic consolidation and political centralization of the country, and more balanced development of urban and rural economies. Relations between the town and its countryside were closer in England which brought to a quicker formation of domestic market than in the countries of continental Europe.

The fact that there was a port in the town favoured successful development of crafts in it. Overseas trade appeared to be the most important factor of production growth as it provided a wide trading area. English merchants all the more tried to drive foreign merchants out of the market which could be especially well seen in London, Bristol, and Southampton. The character of external trade started to change as well. For example, Bristol was one of the first English towns which began to export fabricated production instead of wool. As wool had never been an important export item, there were no essential differences between Bristol’s Merchant Staplers and Merchant Adventurers; belonging to the Merchants of the Staple gave to their members, first of all, legal advantages.

Until the end of the 13 thcentury the main trade turnover took place inside the country at fairs. But by the 14 thcentury their importance had fallen as towns themselves became permanent trade areas. In the 14 th— 15 thcenturies intraurban trade was notable for its significant volume and complexity. At that time trade in various goods was carried out by separate guilds — of fishmongers, cloth dealers, mercers and others — which were established instead of Trade Guild that once united all rightful townspeople. Appearance of the position of a broker is an evidence of increased and complicated trade and financial operations at the market. The sources also show that wholesalers were trying to subordinate small retail trade.

Having united many English counties by trade ties, such towns as London and Bristol began to play a very significant role in forming the national market because before the 14 th— 15 thcenturies domestic trade was to a great extent regional, arranged within narrow borders. There were rather favourable conditions for establishing such a market in England: early centralization of the country, a relative balance between the development of agriculture, industry and trade, and existence of a single economic centre. By the end of the 15 thcentury, as the main part of overseas trade was concentrated in London, the role of Bristol in domestic trade had fallen because it was closely connected with its export and import. A new rise of Bristol as a regional capital in the West of England begins from the time of entering into permanent relations with North-American colonies.

In the 14 th–17 thcenturies essential changes took place in the social sphere too. Rapid growth of industry and trade put forward the richest and most enterprising people. We can see that sometimes a merchant and a production organizer were one and the same person. Documents show how the two ways of capitalist entrepreneurs’ emergence were interwoven: not only a merchant became a manufacturer but, in its turn, a producer transformed into a merchant. Developments in social relations could be seen in the changes of the character of patriciate. There appeared “new” patricians who were closely connected with entrepreneurial activity and strove to drive old patriciate out of town governing.

Processes that took place in craft guilds show that expropriation of the immediate producer and the formation of the wage labour market in the town had begun long before mass peasants’ dispossession of land in the 16 thcentury. Complaints of guilds’ craftsmen that they were being ruined, turning into tramps and paupers show that there was a deep stratification inside the guild already in the 14 thcentury. It seems that enclosures in the English village of the 16 thcentury were connected not so much with the development of Flanders’ manufactory as with the establishment of new forms of cloth production in England itself, all the more so as in the end of the 14 thcentury it was forbidden to export unfinished cloth. Domination of cloth export over wool export by the middle of the 15 thcentury proves that there was the growth of demand for raw materials in England and this was the reason that caused mass enclosures since the end of the 15 thcentury.