Василиса Нешатаева - Культурные ценности. Цена и право
- Название:Культурные ценности. Цена и право
- Автор:
- Жанр:
- Издательство:Литагент «Высшая школа экономики»1397944e-cf23-11e0-9959-47117d41cf4b
- Год:2013
- Город:Москва
- ISBN:978-5-7598-1029-2
- Рейтинг:
- Избранное:Добавить в избранное
-
Отзывы:
-
Ваша оценка:
Василиса Нешатаева - Культурные ценности. Цена и право краткое содержание
Культурные ценности представляют собой особый объект правового регулирования в силу своей двойственной природы: с одной стороны – это уникальные и незаменимые произведения искусства, с другой – это привлекательный объект инвестирования. Двойственная природа культурных ценностей порождает ряд теоретических и практических вопросов, рассмотренных и проанализированных в настоящей монографии: вопрос правового регулирования и нормативного закрепления культурных ценностей в системе права; проблема соотношения публичных и частных интересов участников международного оборота культурных ценностей; проблемы формирования и заключения типовых контрактов в отношении культурных ценностей; вопрос выбора оптимального способа разрешения споров в сфере международного оборота культурных ценностей.
Рекомендуется практикующим юристам, студентам юридических факультетов, бизнесменам, а также частным инвесторам, интересующимся особенностями инвестирования на арт-рынке.
Культурные ценности. Цена и право - читать онлайн бесплатно ознакомительный отрывок
Интервал:
Закладка:
Koumantos G. International Legal Protection of Cultural Property: Introductory Report // International Legal Protection of Cultural Property: Proceedings of the 13. Colloquy on European Law. Delphi. Sept. 20–22. 1983. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Publications Section. 1984. 151 S. (Legal Affairs). P. 12–16.
Kovach K. Good Faith in Mediation – Requested, Recommended, or Required? A New Ethic // Texas Law Review. 1997. Vol. 38 So. P. 575, 595.
Last K. The Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes: Some Issues of Definition // Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes / ed. by the International Bureau of the PCA. Kluwer Law International, 2004. P. 53–84.
McCord J.A. The Strategic Targeting of Diligence: A New Perspective on Stemming the Illicit Trade in Art // Indiana Law Journal. 2005. Vol. 70. P. 985.
Merryman J.H. The Public Interest in Cultural Property// California Law Review. 1989. Vol. 77. P. 339.
Merryman J.H. The Retention of Cultural Property // U.C. Davis Law Review. 1988. Vol. 21. P. 477, 500.
Merryman J.H. Two Ways of Thinking About Cultural Property // American Journal of International Law. 1986. Vol. 80. P. 831, 853.
Moustakas J. Group Rights in Cultural Property: Justifying Strict Inalienability // Cornell Law Review. 1989. Vol. 79. P. 1179.
Nafziger J.A.R. Cultural Heritage Law: The International Regime. Report of the Director of Studies. The Hague Academy of International Law's Centre for Studies and Research, 2005. P. 223–247.
Pecoraro T. W. Choice of Law in Litigation to Recover National Cultural Property: Efforts and Harmonization in Private International Law // Virginia Journal of International Law. 1990–1991. Vol. 31. P. 6.
Prunty A.P. Toward Establishing an International Tribunal for Settlement of Cultural Property Disputes: How to Keep Greece from Loosing Its Marbles // Georgetown Law Journal. 1984. Vol. 72. P. 1155.
Ramier T.P. Agent Judiciaire du Tresor v. Walter: Fait du Prince and a King's Ransom // International Journal of Cultural Property. 1997. Vol. 6. P. 337.
Rau A.S. Mediation in Art-Related Disputes // Studies in Art Law. Vol. 11. Geneva: Centre du Droit de l'Art, 1999. P. 154.
Redman L.E The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: Using a «Shield» Statute as a «Sword» for Obtaining Federal Jurisdiction in Art and Antiquities Cases // Fordham International Law Journal. 2008. Vol. 31. No. 3. P. 788.
Report to Arts and Culture Committee: Lakota Ghost Dance Shirt. Glasgow City Council Working Group on the Repatriation of Artefact. 1998. Nov. 19.
Sandrock О. Foreign Laws Regulating the Export of Cultural Property // Lalive P. International Sales of Works of Art. Geneva: Institute of International Business Law and Practice; Faculté de Droit de Genève, 1988. P. 457, 462.
Sax J.L. Playing Darts with a Rembrandt, Public and Private Rights in Cultural Treasures. Michigan Press, 1999.
Scafidi S. Intellectual Property and Cultural Products // Boston University Law Review. 2001. Vol. 81. P. 793.
Schopler E.H. Annotation, Modern Status of the Rules as to Immunity of Foreign Sovereign from Suit in Federal or State Courts // American Law Reports. 2007. Vol. 25. P. 322.
Seligman Т.К. The Murals of Teotihuacan: A Case Study of Negotiated Resolution // The Ethics of Collecting Cultural Property: Whose Culture? Whose Property? / P.M. Messenger (ed.). University of New Mexico Press, 1989.
Shapiro D. Litigation and Art-Related Disputes // Studies in Art Law: Resolution Methods for Art-Related Disputes. Vol. 11. Proceedings of a Symposium organized on 17 October 1997 / Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Marié-thoz (eds). Zürich: Shulthess Polygraphischer Verlag. 1999. P. 27–28.
Sidorsky D. Contemporary Reinterpretation of the Concept of Human Rights // Steiner HJ., Aston Ph. International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morality. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. P. 327–329.
Sidorsky E. The 1995 Unidroit Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects: the Role of International Arbitration // International Journal of Cultural Property. 1996. Vol. 5. No. 19. P. 34.
Simon D.R. The Sotheby's/Christies Antitrust Scandal and Proposed Changes to Illinois Art Auction Law // DePaul-LCA Journal of Art and Entertainment law. 2002. Vol. 12. P. 269.
Sotheby's Conditions of Sale and Terms of Guarantee (2001) // Merryman J. H., Elsen A.E., Urice S.K. Law, Ethics and the Visual Art. 5th ed. Kluwer Lawl nternational, 2007. P. 1026.
Statutes of the Intergovernmental Committee for Promoting the Return of Cultural Property to Its Countries of Origin or Its Restitution in Case of Illicit Appropriation. Report of the Director General on a Strategy to Facilitate the Restitution of Stolen or Illicitly Exported Cultural Property. UNESCO. 171st sess. Doc. No. 171 EX/14, Add., Annex II (2005).
Stuart W.W. Authenticity of Authorship and the Auction Market // Maine Law Review. 2002. Vol. 54. P. 71.
Sunstein C. Rights and Their Critics // Notre Dame Law Review. 1995. Vol. 70. P. 730.
Svob-Dokic N., Obuljen N. Comparative Cultural Policy Issues Related to Cultural Diversity in South East Europe. Mapping the Approaches and Practices. Policies for Culture – European Cultural Foundation, Amsterdam and ECUMEST Association. Bucharest, 2003. P. 1–6.
Symeonides S.C. A Choice-of-Law Rule for Conflicts Involving Stolen Cultural Property // Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law. 2005. Vol. 38. P. 1187.
The Cleansing of David: the Debate Rages On // The Art Newspaper. 2003. Aug. 6.
The Last Supper Shown // BBC News. 1999. May 27.
Trappe J. Conciliation in the Far East // Arbitration International. 1989. Vol. 5. P. 173.
Weston A. Between Means and Ends // The Monist. 1992. Vol. 75. P. 236, 242.
Wichard J.Ch., Wendland W.B. Mediations as an Option for Resolving Disputes between Indigenous / Traditional Communities and Industry Concerning Traditional Knowledge // Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Policy and practice / B.T. Hoffman (ed.). Cambridge University Press, 2006. P. 477.
Wilf S. What Is Property's Fourth Estate? Cultural Property and the Fiduciary Ideal // Connecticut Journal of International Law. 2001. Vol. 16. P. 177.
Судебная практика
Agudas Chasidei Chabad v. Russian Federation. 466 F. Supp. 2d 6 (D.D.C. 2006).
Allgemeine Versicherunggesellschaft v. E.K. Entscheidugen des BGHZ. Bd. 59. S. 82.
Altmann v. Republic of Austria. 317 F. 3d 954 (9th Cir. 2002).
Argentina v. Weltover. Inc. 504 U.S. 607 (1992).
Attorney – General of New Zealand v. Ortiz & Others. 1982. // Art and Cultural Heritage. Law, Policy and Practice / B.T. Hoffman (ed.) Cambridge University Press, 2006. P. 146.
Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus and the Republic of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, Inc. 717 F Supp. 1374 (S.D. Ind. 1985), affd, 917 F2d 278 (7th Cir. 1990).
Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino. 376 U.S. 398, 421 (1964).
Beyeler v. Italy. A. No. 33202/96 (5 Jan. 2000) // Merry-man J.H., Elsen A.E., Urice S.K. Law, Ethics and the Visual Art. 5th ed. Kluwer Law International, 2007. P. 122–135.
Blaizotv. University of Liège. [1988] ECR379.
Case Concerning Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany) (Judgment of 10 February 2005). URL: www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?pl=3&p2=3&k=d9&case=123&code=la&p3=4
Cassirer v. Kingdom of Spain. 461 F Supp. 2d 1157 (CD. Cal. 2006).
Commission v. Belgium. 293/85R [1985] ECR 3521.
Cristallina S.A. v. Christie, Manson & Woods Infi, Inc., 502 N.Y.S. 2d 165, 171 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986).
Fluoroware, Inc. v. Dainichi Shoji K.K., 999 E Supp. 1265, 1271–1273 (D.Minn. 1997).
Jeanneret v. Vichey. 693 E 2d 259 (2d Cir. 1982).
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Case No. IT-01-42, Indictment of Feb. 22, 2001; Amended Indictment of Mar. 31, 2003.
Indiana v. Carter. 658 N.E. 2d 618 (Ind. App. 1995).
King of Italy v. Marquis Cosimo de Medici Tornaquinci. 34 T.I.R. 623 (CH. 1918).
Lovelace v. Canada. UN Doc. CCPR/C/13/D/24/1977 (1981).
Malewicz v. City of Amsterdam. 362 F. Supp. 2d 298 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
Matteucci v. Communauté française de Belgique, [1988] ECR 5589.
McDonald's Corp. v. Bukele. 960 F. Supp. 1311, 1319 (N.D. 111. 1997).
Menzel v. List. Supreme Court of New York, New York County 49 Misc. 2d 300; 267 N.Y.S. 2d 804 [1966].
Milien Industries, Inc. v. Coordination Council for North American Affairs. 855 E 2d 879 (D.D.C. 1988).
Oetjen v. Cent. Leather Co. 246 U.S. 297,302–303 (1918).
O'Keefe v. Snyder. 83 N.J. 478, 416 A. 2d 862 [1979].
Otto-Preminger-Institute v. Austria II Сальвиа M. Прецеденты Европейского суда по правам человека. СПб.: Юрид. центр Пресс, 2004. С. 624. П. 13.
The State of Eritrea v. The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (28 April 2004). URL: http://www.pca-cpa.org/ENGLISH/RPC/#Partial%20Awards
Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany (42527/98) [2001] ECHR 463 (12 July 2001). URL: www.echr.coe.int/echr/Homepage_EN
Pritzker v. Krishna Gallery of Asian Arts. 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8778. P. 52–53 (N.D. 111. 1995).
Republic of Austria v. Altmann. 541 U.S. 677, 681, 688 (2004).
Republic of Mexico v. Hoffman. 324 U.S. 30, 33–36 (1945).
Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation v. Lubell. 153 A.D. 2d 143, 149, 550 N.Y.S. 2d 618, 221–222 (1st Dep/t 1990), aff d, 77 N.Y. 2d 311, 567 N.Y. 2d 623, 569 N.E. 2d 426 [1999].
Stato Francese v. Ministère per і beni culturali ed ambientali e De Contessini, II diritto di autore (1990) // Merryman J.H., Elsen A.E., Urice S.K. Law. Ethics and the Visual Art. 5th ed. KluwerLawInternational, 2007. P. 151.
Supreme Court of Costa Rica, Decision of May 12, 1983 // Merryman J.H., Elsen A.E., Urice S.K. Law, Ethics and the Visual Art. 5th ed. Kluwer Law International. 2007. P. 121.
The Schooner Exchange v. McFaddon. 11 U.S. 116 3 L.Ed. 287(1812).
Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of Am. 549 E 2d 597 (9th Cir. 1976).
T.T. Exclusive Cars, Inc. v. Christie's et al. 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19055 (S.D.N.Y 18 December. 1996).
Underhill v. Hernandez. 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897).
Verlinden B.V. v. Central Bank of Nigeria. 461 U.S. 480, 486 (1983).
Wingrove v. the United Kingdom II Сальвиа M. Прецеденты Европейского суда по правам человека. СПб.: Юрид. центр Пресс, 2004. С. 624. П. 14.
Winkworth v. Christie Manson & Woods Ltd. 1980 // Gerstenblith P. Art, Cultural Heritage, and the Law: Cases and Materials. 2d. Carolina Academic Press, 2008. P. 482.
W.S. Kirkpatrick & Co. V. Envtl. Tectonics Corp., Infi. 493 U.S.400 (1990).
Дело о ввозе раритетных авто // Определение Челябинского областного суда № 33-4062/2011.
Электронные ресурсы
Интервал:
Закладка:
