Кэролайн Криадо Перес - Невидимые женщины [Почему мы живем в мире, удобном только для мужчин. Неравноправие, основанное на данных] [litres]

https://genderpolicyreport.umn.edu/tax-proposals-a-missed-opportunity-for-addressing-implicit-gender-bias/; European Parliament (2017), Gender Equality and Taxation in the European Union .

https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/deducting-business-expenses.

http://fortune.com/2016/07/23/expense-policies-hurt-women/.

https://www.gingerbread.org.uk/policy-campaigns/publications-index/statistics/.

https://singlemotherguide.com/single-mother-statistics/.

Fawcett Society (2017), Does Local Government Work for Women?

Goldin, Claudia and Rouse, Cecilia (2000), ‘Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of ‘Blind’ Auditions on Female Musicians’, American Economic Review , 90:4, 715–41.

https://www.stltoday.com/entertainment/arts-and-theatre/in-orchestras-a-sea-change-in-gender-proportions/article_25cd8c54-5ca4-529f-bb98-8c5b08c64434.html.

https://nyphil.org/about-us/meet/musicians-of-the-orchestra.

Kunovich, Sheri and Slomczynski, Kazimierz M. (2007), ‘Systems of Distribution and a Sense of Equity: A Multilevel Analysis of Meritocratic Attitudes in Post-industrial Societies’, European Sociological Review , 23:5, 649–63; Castilla., Emilio J. and Benard, Stephen (2010), ‘The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly , 55:4, 543–676.

Reynolds, Jeremy and Xian, He (2014), ‘Perceptions of meritocracy in the land of opportunity’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility , 36, 121–37.

Castilla and Benard (2010).

http://fortune.com/2014/08/26/performance-review-gender-bias/8; Castilla and Benard (2010).

Castilla and Benard (2010).

http://stateofstartups.firstround.com/2016/#highlights-diversity-prediction.

Uhlmann, Eric Luis and Cohen, Geoffrey L. (2007), ‘“I think it, therefore it’s true”: Effects of self-perceived objectivity on hiring discrimination’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 104:2, 207–23; Castilla and Benard (2010).

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/11/20/the-tech-industrys-gender-discrimination-problem.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/11/20/the-tech-industrys-gender-discrimination-problem.

https://hbr.org/2014/10/hacking-techs-diversity-problem.

Центр поддержки талантов и инноваций (Center for Talent Innovation, CTI) – некоммерческая организация, базирующаяся в Нью-Йорке; аналитический центр, объединяющий представителей частного сектора (4 млн работников более 90 компаний и организаций из 190 стран), заинтересованных в привлечении новых талантов для получения конкурентных преимуществ.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/04/why-is-siliconvalley-so-awful-to-women/517788/.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-women-tech-20150222-story.html#page=1.

Reynolds and Xian (2014).

STEM (от англ. science, technology, engineering and maths – естесственные науки, технологии, инженерия и математика).

Handley, Ian M., Brown, Elizabeth R., Moss-Racusin, Corinne A. and Smith, Jessi L. (2015), ‘Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 112:43, 13201–13206.

https://erc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/file/Gender_statistics_April_2014.pdf; Wenneras, C. and Wold, A. (1997), ‘Nepotism and sexism in peer-review’, Nature , 387:341; Milkman, Katherine L., Akinola, Modupe and Chugh, Dolly (2015), ‘What Happens Before? A Field Experiment Exploring How Pay and Representation Differentially Shape Bias on the Pathway Into Organizations’, Journal of Applied Psychology , 100:6, 1678–712; Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia, Glynn, Carroll J. and Huge, Michael (2013), ‘The Matilda Effect in Science Communication’, Science Communication , 35:5, 603–25; Kaatz, Anna, Gutierrez, Belinda and Carnes, Molly (2014), ‘Threats to objectivity in peer review: the case of gender’, Trends Pharmacol Sci. , 35:8, 371–3; Women and Science Unit (2011), White Paper on the Position of Women in Science in Spain , UMYC.

Women and Science Unit (2011); https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/04/19/how-to-get-tenure-if-youre-a-woman-academia-stephen-walt.

Roberts, Sean G. and Verhoef, Tessa (2016), ‘Double-blind reviewing at EvoLang 11 reveals gender bias’, Journal of Language Evolution , 1:2, 163–67; Budden, Amber E., Tregenza, Tom, Aarssen, Lonnie W., Koricheva, Julia, Leimu, Roosa and Lortie, Christopher J. (2008), ‘Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors’, Trends in Ecology & Evolution , 23:1, 4–6.

Там же.

Knobloch-Westerwick, Glynn and Huge (2013); Maliniak, Daniel, Powers, Ryan and Walter, Barbara F. (2013), ‘The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations’, International Organization; Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, Lange, Samantha and Brus, Holly (2013), ‘Gendered Citation Patterns in International Relations’, Journal of International Studies Perspectives , 14:4, 485–92.

King, Molly M., Bergstrom, Carl T., Correll, Shelley J., Jacquet, Jennifer, and West, Jevin D. (2017), ‘Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time’ Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World , 3: 1–22.

Bagilhole, Barbara and Goode, Jackie (2001), ‘The Contradiction of the Myth of Individual Merit, and the Reality of a Patriarchal Support System in Academic Careers: A Feminist Investigation’, European Journal of Women’s Studies , 8:2, 161–80.

Krawczyk, Michał (2017), Are all researchers male? Gender misattributions in citations, Scientometrics , 110:3, 1397–1402.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/12/upshot/even-famous-female-economists-get-no-respect.html.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/10/upshot/when-teamwork-doesnt-work-for-women.html?mcubz=1.

Knobloch-Westerwick, Glynn and Huge (2013).

https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/04/19/how-to-get-tenure-if-youre-a-woman-academia-stephen-walt/.

https://www.chronicle.com/article/Thanks-for-Listening/233825.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/female-profs-morework-1.4473910.

Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin and Hesli, Vicki L., ‘Women Don’t Ask? Women Don’t Say No? Bargaining and Service in the Political Science Profession, PS: Political Science & Politics , 46:2, 355–369; Guarino, Cassandra M. and Borden, Victor M. H. (2017), ‘Faculty Service Loads and Gender: Are Women Taking Care of the Academic Family?’, Research in Higher Education , 58:6 672–694.

https://hbr.org/2018/03/for-women-and-minorities-to-get-ahead-managers-must-assign-work-fairly; Laperriere, Eve, Messing, Karen and Bourbonnais, Renee (2017), ‘Work activity in food service: The significance of customer relations, tipping practices and gender for preventing musculoskeletal disorders’, Applied Ergonomics , 58, 89–101.

Guarino and Borden (2017); Baker, Maureen (2012), Academic Careers and the Gender Gap , Canada; Gibney, Elizabeth (2017), ‘Teaching load could put female scientists at career disadvantage’, Nature , https://www.nature.com/news/teaching-load-could-put-female-scientists-at-career-disadvantage-1.21839; Women and Science Unit (2011), White Paper on the Position of Women in Science in Spain , UMYC.

Amy Bug (2010), ‘Swimming against the unseen tide’, Phys. World , 23:08; Boring, Anne, Ottoboni, Kellie and Stark, Philip B. (2016), ‘Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness’ ScienceOpen Research .

Boring, Anne, Ottoboni, Kellie and Stark, Philip B. (2016).

http://activehistory.ca/2017/03/shes-hot-female-sessional-instructors-gender-bias-and-student-evaluations/.

MacNell, Lillian, Driscoll, Adam and Hunt, Andrea N. (2015), ‘What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching’, Innovative Higher Education , 40:4, 291–303.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/womens-blog/2015/feb/13/female-academics-huge-sexist-bias-students.

http://activehistory.ca/2017/03/shes-hot-female-sessional-instructors-gender-bias-and-student-evaluations/.

Storage, Daniel, Home, Zachary, Cimpian, Andrei and Leslie, Sarah-Jane (2016), ‘The Frequency of ‘‘Brilliant’’ and ‘‘Genius’’ in Teaching Evaluations Predicts the Representation of Women and African Americans across Fields’, PLoS ONE 11:3; Leslie, Sarah-Jane, Cimpian, Andrei, Meyer, Meredith and Freeland, Edward (2015), ‘Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines’, Science, 347:6219, 262–5; Meyer, Meredith, Cimpian, Andrei and Leslie, Sarah-Jane (2015), ‘Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance’, Frontiers in Psychology , 6:235.

Banchefsky, Sarah, Westfall, Jacob, Park, Bernadette and Judd, Charles M. (2016), ‘But You Don’t Look Like A Scientist!: Women Scientists with Feminine Appearance are Deemed Less Likely to be Scientists’, Sex Roles , 75:3–4, 95–109.

Bian, Lin, Leslie, Sarah-Jane and Cimpian, Andrei (2017), ‘Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests’, Science, 355: 6323, 389–391.

https://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/institutions/bias.html.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/31/women-science-industry-structure-sexist-courses-careers.