Фрэнк Маклинн - Чингисхан. Человек, завоевавший мир

SHW p. 278; SHO p. 129; SHR p. 176; Grousset, Empire p. 208. For a complete list of the Tartar clans and septs at Dalan Nemurges see Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 240–245.

SHW p. 279.

Hambis, Genghis Khan pp. 72–73; Rachewiltz, Commentary pp. 572–573.

RT I pp. 182–183; Krause, Cingis Han p. 19.

SHW pp. 279–280; SHO pp. 130–131; SHE p. 79.

Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan p. 99; Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes p. 172.

Grousset, Empire p. 208.

SHO p. 135; SHR p. 84; Vladimirtsov, Le regime social p. 76. Ilkha's title was 'Senggum'. Some historians have mistaken the title for the man and refer to the Kereit prince as 'Senggum' as if this were a proper name.

Rachewiltz (Commentary p. 594) points out that in his contemptuous references to Ilkha, Toghril implies that the Senggum is his only son. Now it is known that Toghril had at least two sons, so either he was being distinctly unpaternal to the other one(s) or they had already died.

RT I p. 183.

SHO pp. 136–137. Others say the quid pro quo was to be marriage between Temujin's daughter Qojin and Ilkha's son Tusaqa (Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan pp. 84–86).

RT I p. 184.

Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan p. 68.

SHC pp. 88–90.

Свершившегося факта ( фр .).

SHW p. 281: SHO pp. 136–139; SHR pp. 58–61.

«Сокровенное сказание», § 160. — Прим. пер .

This is the translation provided by Waley (SHW p. 281). Onon endorses this translation except for changing the two key descriptions to 'the lark that stays with you' as opposed to 'a distant lark'. Onon claims this is the difference between the species melanocorypha mongolica and alauda (usually known as eremophila) alpestris (SHO p. 133). Grousset has a much looser translation: 'I am the lark living ever in the same place in the good season and the bad — Temujin is the wild goose [sic] which flies away in winter.' (Grousset, Empire p. 209) Gumilev, Imaginary Kingdom, has 'I am a permanently present gull [sic] but my anda is a migratory bird, a lark.'.

Также Трансоксания, Мавераннахр, историческая область в Центральной Азии, междуречье Амударьи и Сырдарьи с городами Самарканд, Бухара и др. — Прим. пер .

SHO p. 156; SHR pp. 102–103; Gumilev, Imaginary Kingdom p. 252.

SHO p. 158; SHR p. 104.

SHC p. 93; Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan pp. 84–86.

SHW p. 285.

For full details see RT I p. 185. For Temujin's reward of the two herdsmen at the quriltai of 1206 see SHO pp. 191, 209; SHR pp. 133–134, 149–150; Rachewiltz, Commentary pp. 607–609.

RT I p. 191.

Vladimirtsov, Genghis Khan p. 51.

SHO pp. 143–145; SHR pp. 91–92.

RT I p. 186.

SHC pp. 148–149.

SHO pp. 145–146, 197–199; SHR pp. 91–92, 139–141; SHC pp. 96–98.

Rachewiltz, Commentary pp. 623–624. For other accounts of Qalqaljid Sands see JB I p. 37; Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 45–47; Grousset, Empire pp. 157–160.

Эти слова принадлежат предводителю тубегенов Ачих-Шируну: «Покажись только они нам на глаза, так мы загребем их в полы халатов, словно скотский помет». «Сокровенное сказание» (§ 174). — Прим. пер .

SHO pp. 148–149; SHR p. 95.

Последний, смертельный удар ( фр .).

SHO p. 147; SHR pp. 92–93.

SHC pp. 98–99; SHO p. 147; SHR p. 94.

Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan pp. 70–71.

JB I p. 38; SHO pp. 149–150, SHR p. 95; Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 406–407.

Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan p. 77.

«Сокровенное сказание», § 177. — Прим. пер .

RT I pp. 187–190; Mostaert, Sur quelques passages pp. 96–97; SHO pp. 150–157; SHR pp. 96–104; SHC pp. 102–109. Temujin listed the following as his principal grievances: 1) he had brought backjaqa Gambu from China to help Toghril; 2) he had executed Sacha Beki and Taichen at the Ong Khan's request; 3) he gave to Toghril booty from his raid on the Merkit in 1196 but when the Ong Khan raided them in 1198, he gave Temujin nothing; 4) he had sent his four best generals — the 'four hounds' — to rescue Toghril when sorely beset by the Naiman.

Война не на жизнь, а на смерть, до победного конца ( фр .).

Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan p. 78.

Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 71–72.

d'Ohsson, Histoire I p. 45; Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 42–46. The exact location of the famous Lake Baljuna is unknown. It may be a tributary of the Ingoda River or it may be another name for Lake Balzino, source of the River Tura, south of modem Chita.

Grousset, Conqueror of the World pp. 134–135.

Pelliot, always a contrarian, maintained that the Baljuna covenant was legendary (Pelliot, 'Une ville musulmane dans la Chine du Nord sous les Mongols,' Journal Asiatique 211 (1927) pp. 261–279). But Cleaves, in a superb display of scholarship, has proved beyond doubt that the oath was a genuine historical event (Cleaves, 'The Historicity of the Baljuna Covenant,' Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 18 (1955) рр. 357–421). See also Krause, Cingis Han p. 23; Grenard, Genghis Khan (1935) р. 246.

Krause, Cingis Han p. 94.

Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 664.

SHO pp. 158–159; SHR pp. 104–105.

d'Ohsson, Histoire I p. 81; SHO pp. 159–160; SHR pp. 105–106.

Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 664.

Krause, Cingis Han p. 24; Herrmann, Atlas of China p. 49.

For Muqali see SHC p. 147; Rachewiltz, 'Muqali, Bol, Tas and Ant'ung,' Papers on Ear Eastern History 15 (1977) pp. 45–62.

RT I pp. 65, 191; SHR pp. 109–110; SHO p. 164; SHC pp. 113–115; d'Ohsson, Histoire I p. 82.

Pelliot, 'A propos des Comans', Journal Asiatique 15 (1920) pp. 125–185 (at pp. 180–185).

Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 677.

SHO p. 165; SHR pp. 110–112.

Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan p. 180.

Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 416–417.

Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 36, 56, 123–124, 127, 245–247, 398.

RT I pp. 94–95.

RT I p. 192.

For the Naiman see RT I pp. 67–70; Roemer et al, History of the Turkic Peoples.

Pelliot, 'Chretiens d'Asie centrale et d'Extreme-Orient,' T'oung Pao (1914) pp. 630–631; Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 685.

RT I pp. 70, 201; Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes p. 364.

Mostaert, Sur quelques passages p. 110; Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 308–309; Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 679.

ibid. p. 689.

SHC pp. 119–120; Mostaert, Sur quelques passages p. 252.

Larry Moses, A theoretical approach to the process of Inner Asian confederation,' Etudes Mongoles 5 (1974) pp. 113–122 (at pp. 115–117).

SHR pp. 111–112.

SHR p. 202.

SHR p. 201.

For example, the decisive battle of Chakirmaut was fought at the foot of Mount Naqu. Some of the sources, aware that two battles were fought against the Naiman, identify Chakirmaut and Naqu Cliffs as two separate and distinct battles. Grousset amalgamates aspects of both battles in his account (Empire Mongol pp. 163–168).

SHC pp. 125–127; Vladimirtsov, Genghis Khan p. 60.

SHW p. 297; SHO pp. 169–170; SHR pp. 115–116.

Rachewiltz regards this as the first order issued under Temujin's new legal code, the Yasa (Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 697).

SHO pp. 171–172; SHR pp. 116–117.

Rachewiltz thinks some of these locations are implausible (Commentary pp. 695–696).

Rachewiltz locates Mt Naqu at 47° N 104° E (Commentary p. 703).

Krause, Cingis Han p. 26.

SHO pp. 172–176; SHR pp. 118–121.

d'Ohsson, Histoire I p. 87; Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan p. 85.

RT I p. 204.

SHO p. 177; SHR p. 122.

RT I p. 202.

For Tayang's death see d'Ohsson, Histoire I pp. 87–88; Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 720.

Grousset, Conqueror of the World pp. 152–161.

SHO p. 177; SHR p. 122.

SHO p. 177; SHR p. 122.

SHO p. 185.

SHR pp. 128–130.

Mostaert, Sur quelques passages 126–127.

See the outstanding analysis in Gumilev, Imaginary Kingdom pp. 244–260.

For two different assessments see Timothy May, 'Jamugka and the Education of Chinggis Khan,' Acta Mongolica 6 (2006) pp. 273–286 and Owen Lattimore, 'Honor and Loyalty: the case of Temukin and Jamukha,' in Clark & Draghi, Aspects of Altaic Civilization pp. 127–138.